Home
Photo Galleries
News Sports Open Forum Obituaries Legal Notices Events

Tuesday | June 27, 2017

SEARCH  

ADVERTISING

Rates
Deadlines
Policy

SUBSCRIPTIONS

Subscribe/Renew
Counter copies
CONTACT US
Letters to the Editor
Our Location

ABOUT US

Staff
Mission Statement
Memberships
Click for Outing, Minnesota Forecast
National Newspaper AssociationMN Newspaper Association

The Northland Press is a legally adjudicated newspaper



Open Forum

In the beginning

Letter to the Editor

From the book of Genesis, Chapter 1, verse 1, it reads, “In the beginning God created heaven and earth.” This will undoubtedly bring out a huge outcry from the far left who over the last sixty years have in not very subtle ways been trying to destroy all belief in God in our country. Meanwhile, taxpayers have shelled out billions of dollars to bring to fruition the dreams of men like Al Gore (climate change prophet extraordinaire) who has for decades been preaching his gospel on climate change. Where has all the money gone? Like cream rising to the top, it ends up in the pockets of those at the top of this agenda, leaving those at the bottom suffering from strangulating regulations and in some countries barely eking out the bare necessities to live. Look at Venezuela, China, India, Russia, etc. Are you aware California in the past has allowed 100 year old family owned farms and orchards to be put out of business by the environmentalists bent on saving a tiny fresh waster fish we call smelt. They would rather see fresh water flow into the ocean then help out the farms and orchards. Keep in mind, climate has changed drastically over thousands of years. Minnesota was once covered by glaciers which as they slowly moved, gouged huge craters creating our 10,000 lakes. There is a simple solution. Show me one man or woman in this world who can change the direction of the rising or setting of the sun, start or stop and earthquake, volcanic eruption, tsunami, flood or tornado. Until then, I will continue to firmly believe only God is in control of the climate, not man.

Dolores Zaske,
Pine River, MN

P.S.: It’s a good thing the environmentalists weren’t around during the time of the dinosaurs.

Back to Top

Sen. Franken: The health care debate affects all of us

Letter to the Editor

As I’ve traveled across Minnesota in recent months, Minnesotans have made it clear to me just how important health care is to them, their families, and their communities. They want to know that when they are sick or injured they can get the care they need.

Because health care is so important, most people in Minnesotans understand what’s at stake as they’ve watched Congressional Republicans continue push to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and replace it with a plan that will rip health coverage from 23 million people, raise health costs, gut Medicaid, and eliminate nationwide protections for people with preexisting conditions.

I have had meetings in large and small Minnesota communities during which I’ve heard parents tearfully describe their struggle to get care for family members with chronic health conditions and their anxiety about the financial and emotional burden of supporting an elderly loved one in a nursing home. They are worried about what the Republican plan would mean to them.

I’ve also heard from health care providers, who have told me they likely won’t be able to deliver many of the essential services their patients and communities need if the Republican plan is enacted.

Unfortunately, Republicans are recklessly moving forward with their destructive efforts and may hold a Senate vote on their bill in just a few weeks, despite the fact that that this bill remains at its core a giant tax break for the wealthy at the expense of care for the poor and vulnerable. If this bill passes, millionaires would receive an average tax break of more than $50,000 apiece each year and the 400 highest-income taxpayers, with annual incomes above $300 million, will do even better, with an average annual tax break of $7 million each annually.

Nearly all major doctor, hospital, nursing, patient and consumer groups strongly oppose the plan because of the harm it will do to so many Americans. Now is the time to speak up and fight to oppose this bill so that all Minnesotans can maintain access to the high quality care we are known for.

Republican Medicaid Cuts are “Personal”
Minnesotans understand that this bill will harm the health and well being of millions of people in our state and across the country.

The proposed Medicaid cuts offer a clear example. The Republican bill would cut $834 billion from Medicaid, which covers more than half of all nursing home residents, half of all births, and is the primary source of coverage for people with disabilities.

The program is jointly funded by states and the federal government, which means that under the Republican plan, Minnesota stands to lose $2.5 billion in Medicaid funding in the first 18 months alone, and those losses would climb to $5 billion per year over the coming years.

Make no mistake, people in Cass County will be hit hard. The state estimates that 8,627 Cass County residents who have health care coverage through Medical Assistance or MinnesotaCare would be at risk.

The Minnesotans I’ve met with have described what these losses would mean to their loved ones, neighbors and communities. Angela, a full-time health care worker at the hospital in Perham told me that for her, the Medicaid cuts “are personal.” Through tears, she told me that her mother needs round-the-clock care, but if the Republican Medicaid cuts are enacted, her mother will have no place to turn to get the care she needs.

Later, at a Moorhead nursing home, I heard from Mari, who was able to care for her mother, Chrysann, at her home until declining health and complications required her mom to move to a nursing home. Mari said that without Medicaid, she, her husband, and their kids would not have had any other options. Chrysann is now worried about her own future, telling me that it seems like the Republican plan is not about taking care of people, but about “survival of the fittest.” This reform bill will take us in the wrong direction.

Need to Work Together
While the ACA has not been without challenges, most Americans want Congressional Republicans to end their divisive effort to repeal it, and instead do what we should have been doing all along: working together to improve it and build on its progress.

I have urged my Republican colleagues to join me in an effort to bring down health care costs. For example by addressing skyrocketing prescription drug prices that are driving up premiums and forcing too many Americans to choose between buying need medications and paying for basic necessities like food or rent.

We also need to increase competition in the health insurance exchanges. We should increase subsidies for middle class families, support a public option, and provide support to offset the costs of the sickest and most costly patients.

This important health care debate will impact people in Cass County and across our state in profound ways. As millions of Americans struggle to keep their heads above water - pay their bills, raise their kids, care for their parents, and cope with health problems - they need our help, not a plan that undercuts those efforts. That’s why I oppose the Republican plan, and will fight to make health care better for all Americans.

Al Franken represents Minnesota in the U.S. Senate

Death by a thousand cuts

Letter to the Editor

At WAPOA’s recent annual meeting Jeff Forster from the Minnesota Lakes & Rivers Advocates spoke of his concern about a growing trend that separates local people from local decisions. He said “Existing minimum shoreline rules have been ignored locally for many years. Local water quality is suffering ‘death by a thousand cuts.’ We are looking at 80% more variances for shoreland development. So even the minimal rules that we passed are being undone.”

That brings me to the decision a few years ago by the City Counsel to fire the local P & Z staff and turn over their duties to Crow Wing County staff and appoint an almost all-new P & Z Commission. This Commission at their May 26 meeting had 9 variance applications.

Four to reduce lake setbacks, one to reduce bluff setback, two to increase building height and two to increase time to complete building. It is the four reductions in lake setback that are exactly what Mr. Foster is concern about.

Increasing the frequency of approving variances that effect water quality is the ‘death by a thousand cuts’. Water quality was also one of the major concerns identified by the Crosslakers and the Minnesota Design Team study group and one of their major recommendations were to bring back the P & Z function to local control.

Can you guess how many of the 9 variance applications were approved? THAT’S RIGHT ALL 9.

Richard Dietz
Crosslake, MN

Back to Top
Northland Press  |  P.O. Box 145 | Outing, MN  56662  |  (218) 692-5842